March 05, 2013

Agenda 21 Targets The Traditional Family Unit and 2nd Amendment

PART 1

Agenda 21 is a menace to Kentucky and humanity. Many have been trying to shed light these last 10 years on how A21 is being carried out through family courts. In order for this policy to succeed, war was and is still being waged upon "traditional marriage, family, and parents." Not only have mothers been targeted, as this one story highlights, here: http://educate-yourself.org/cn/stacylynnestory28sep12.shtml - but fathers have been a primary target all along.

The risk of public corruption in Kentucky is high even though it has corruption laws that are stronger than 3/5ths of the other states. Yet despite this, Kentucky still received a grad of C-. The catagories that caused this score to be lower even with the strong corruption laws were (1) Judicial Accountability, (2) Ethics Enforcment, and (3) redistricting. http://weku.fm/post/public-corruption-risk-high-kentucky

With Judicial Accountability scoring an F at rock bottom, it's easy to see how A21 has it's crosshairs on the traditional family unit. Family Court is where A21 is hard at work.

Most Complaints filed with the Judicial Conduct Commission are made against Family Courts. Family judges only make up 11% of the total judges in the state, yet have the most complaints filed against them.(domestic relations/protective order/juvenile combined - 43%) and made by the parents (litigants - 60%) impacted by A21's assault on the traditional family unit. http://courts.ky.gov/commissionscommittees/JCC/Documents/Public_Information/JCFY20112012.pdf

COMING FROM THE UN - 

The primary means of spreading Radical feminist ideology around the world is through the U.N.’s NGOs.

Because everyone knows TRADITIONAL FAMILIES are nothing more than abuse, torture, murder and enslavement of women!



The Feminists that played a pivotal role in implementing their misandrist, patriarchy-destroying (i.e. family destroying) policies here in the West, are trying to do the same thing to the rest of the world through the U.N

Commission on Population and Development - The annual meeting of the CPD is consistently a battleground upon which radical feminists and their U.N. allies fight conservative and pro-family advocates http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/06/in-bed-with-radical-feminists-the-uns-misguided-womens-agenda



LAWYER AIDS UN ANTI-FAMILY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MYTHS


The propaganda repeats each year in the legislature with more laws introduced in order to continue to propagate " the UN Agenda 21 Anti-Family policies through the myths and lies that all men are abusers and all women are victims"  over and over through new bills with the same theme every year." Sen. Whitney Westerfield passes HB 9 out of Senate Judiciary Committee.
http://www.kentucky.com/2013/02/28/2536023/ky-senate-panel-votes-for-first.html


2010 Testimony in opposition to the attempt to expand the policy GPS tracking in Family Court.: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln-15y1KxdM


In the background of the video above is Greg Stumbo's wife, and Darlene Thomas director of the (UN) bluegrass dometic violence program.(propaganda organization) they became very concerned about my testimony and after a short while Thomas began sending out text warnings to other radical feminist agents. This is what a radical feminist UN A21 agent looks like. Darlene Thomas --------->

PROGRAMMING BY RADICAL FEMINISTS IN SCHOOLS

Five days out of seven, domestic violence advocate Charlsie Banks says she gets word of a middle or high school student who is in an abusive dating relationship.

"It's everywhere and there's not a lot being done to combat it," said Banks, the director of a Renfro Valley-based regional domestic violence program.
It's not unusual for Kentucky teens to be hit, slapped, shoved or sexually assaulted by their boyfriends or girlfriends, advocates say.

Under House Bill 98, introduced in the General Assembly by State Rep. Joni Jenkins and assigned to the House Education Committee, incidents of dating violence between students ages 13 to 19 in Kentucky schools would have to be reported to the state Department of Education by school staff and included in a statewide data collection system.

PART 2 - 2ND AMENDMENT DISARMAMENT SCHEME

The "stand with the sheriff" hype that's going around, to protect 2A rights from fed take away, is hypocrisy, when they are aiding the family courts to do it under that A21 disarmament scheme.

The purpose in carrying out the agenda 21 domestic petition/orders used by family court is (1) often banish the father out of his childrens life, and how they are (2) an assault on the 2nd Amendment to the tune of 12,000 people a year stripped by the arbitrary stroke of the judges pen, no crime, charge, or jury, 90% of the time based upon false allegations.

In jefferson County, They make the person, mostly a man, turn in any guns upon the entry of one of these DV orders. Again, most are false allegations with no evidence of an actual crime. No charge, no jury, stroke of a pen, 2A rights gone

This is done by state family courts doing the bidding of the federal government. Upon the domestic forms it is printed at the bottom that you will be in violation of federal law 18 U.S.C. § 921 (g)(8) if you possess a firearm after one of these orders are entered against you.

18 U.S.C. § 922(g) states:
It shall be unlawful for any person–

(8) who is subject to a court order that–
(A) was issued after a hearing of which such person

received actual notice, and at which such person had an opportunity to
participate;
(B) restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or
threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such
intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would
place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the
intimate partner or child; and
(C) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, or attempted
use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner
or child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury; or
(9) who has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor
crime of domestic violence

to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or
affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any
firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in
interstate or foreign commerce.
Some states have actual misdemeanor charges, but not in Kentucky, it's a CIVIL injunction. You lose 2A rights upon a civil injunction. no crime, charge, or jury verdict - just the stroke of a judges pen - 90% of the time based upon false allegations! This is the scheme.

This next story illustrates. Please keep in Mind they always only highlight the few stories of women, and always leave out the stories of men killed, by women, because thats what leftists do. They hype a biased report to acheive the political goal, in this case disarmament.
"Although a federal law now prohibits domestic violence offenders from possessing a firearm, only one county in Kentucky routinely makes them turn over their guns. In Jefferson County, those offenders have 24 hours after their court hearing to turn in their guns to the Sheriff's Department.

"It's an automatic process," said Chris Hancock, the operations commander for the Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, which now has a vault with 4,700 firearms of every kind. "I most certainly think it saves lives."
Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2009/09/17/938842/nunns-case-puts-target-on-violent.html#storylink=cpy

 "violent offenders" in the above Nunn case title is hyped up spin. 90% of the claims are false allegations with no evidence of anything. No penalties are imposed for perjury.

DVO's in KY are not convictions, but the media and radical feminists agents of the UN A21 spin them as such, when in fact they are only civil injunctions. They are A21 disarmament schemes.

They are still using that poor mother to push their agenda.

If you care about stopping this radical leftist agenda being carried out through Kentucky's Family Courts, and aid of members of the Kentucky Bar Association, educate yourself to this, then get together with various groups who know and understand the problem, and demand your legislature put a stop to this radical agenda that is waging war on families. Abolish the Domestic Violence Petitions. Seek to hold accountable family judges who carry out these practices by impeaching them.  

For more information, send an email to kyleaks@gmail.com




September 08, 2012

To Combat Corruption Shared Parenting Law Needed

Shared parenting law is needed in Kentucky. What is Shared parenting? This effort of the last ten years puts a spotlight the corruption that has crept into to a process. we all believe these courts were operating for the protection of the peoples rights coming before it. But investigations have revealed a long history of exploitation, extortion, racketeering, and ransom by family courts in Kentucky.


Shared parenting is an effort to solemnize the inherent right of both parents to be equally in their children's lives after divorce; and stop exploitation of people being professionally taken advantage of.

A bill needs to be filed in the general assembly that will move toward the presumption of shared parenting from the onset on all dissolution of marriage cases.

It's happening everywhere - this is a war on fathers, and broken families are the collateral.
http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/2012/09/06/israel-jails-dads-protesting-family-courts/

The Hidden Tyranny of Family Courts


Even citizens attempting to use the law to deter egregious misconduct are being obstructed. 

The General Assembly needs to step up and bring Shared Parenting Law to pass in Kentucky

July 21, 2012

Kentucky Tea Party Rally Exposes Family Court Injustices



Tea Party activists have turned their sights on yet more waste, fraud, and abuse of the public trust by actors of state government. A rally took place in Lexington Kentucky at 120 N. Limestone outside the Fayette Family Courthouse. Activists were drawing attention to the problems of what is claimed to be (well documented and known) widespread waste, fraud, and abuse of power in family courts.

Judges are acting with official misconduct in violation of the Kentucky Bill of Rights Sec. 2.  disrespecting and violating the rights of parents and their children, among other things. They are appointing friends of the court into cases, guardian ad litem's, and more into cases, fabricating made up reasons to force parents into "supervised" visitation schemes, all concocted to ensnare and extort further money from the parent(s). A racketeering operation of epic appearances.

Corruption is BAD in Kentucky state government, sometimes it seems, and family courts are heard upon as a worse part. The legislative branch of state government has been receiving hundred's of complaints the last 2 years, petitions from citizens, and petitions to impeach the malfeasant state actors. The Kentucky general assembly has continued to turn a blind eye. The corruption of the family court has also corrupted the general assembly, to deny Kentuckians their right to impeach these despots. That being said, a lawless gang have we?, and We The People have the right to self defense from a lawless gang, and to arrest it, and to restore our republic form of state government that we have not had since 1976.

County court watchers have documented and compiled enough evidence to prove that it is an unaccountable and out of control burden upon all Kentuckians. It will be stopped... either by the law, or by the people. If no Redress, then what?
Something to say, share? kyleaks@gmail.com

April 10, 2012

CITIZEN PETITION TO IMPEACH COVERED UP AS SESSION NEAR OVER.


A citizen petition to impeach a family court judge, filed with the Ky House of Representatives Clerk on January 24, 2012, and read into the record by the reading clerk has been and about to be denied any process before any committee. From here where the petition went know one really knows for sure. The petitioner said he was informed it had been assigned to the House Judiciary Committee. Calls to the Judiciary Committee were met with "it would not be on the agendas." That was in the first week of February.  As each week rolled by and the petitioner was given no opportinnity to begin to present the case for impeachment, the calls requesting such were eventually not returned. This was going into March. 

It is now April 10 and the session ends in 2 days. Petitioner has claimed that House Speaker Greg Stumbo, and Judiciary Chair John Tilley have conspired to deny the petitioner the right to redress this grienvamce, be heard, make a record, and get a determination of cause, or not, for impeachment. This violated the oath of office and even makes them complcit to the causes outlined as ground for impeachment in the petiton. It's also highly questionable that lawyer members in the lead postitions of the house are acting to cover-up a petition to impeach a family court judge.  Jack Conway's office will not investigate.

State Media has been silent giving no coverage to even mentioning the petition filing. People across Kentucky involved in Tea Party activism are scratching their heads and wondering just what kind of government they have in Frankfort? Any person in Kentucky by right and law may file a petition for Impeachment, and has further right to a process and a meaningful opportunity to make their case.

The petitioner has stated there is real concern that he could be retaliated against. No one should let the injustice of denying a right expressed in the law, to Petition for Redress of grievance, pass quietly. A protected 1st amendment right.


UPDATE: LAWSUIT FILED: http://kybordc.blogspot.com/2013/02/beshear-and-stumbo-sued-for-deprivation.html#!/2013/02/beshear-and-stumbo-sued-for-deprivation.html



February 25, 2012

IMPEACHMENT OF FAMILY COURT JUDGE FILED TO KY HOUSE



Is Greg Stumbo covering up on an impeachment petition?
 


On January 24 2012, HI1 - House Impeachment 1, was filed with the clerk of the Kentucky House of representatives. The petition was read into the record under "motions, petitions, and communications" then delivered to the committee on committees. From the beginning, the petition as written on the face of the document directed "to creat an impeachment committee." A house staff member, Scott Jones, informed the Petitioner that it would be assigned to the judiciary committee. The petitioner informed them that was an error, and should have an independent impeachment committee created.

The right to the process is secured in the Kentucky Constitution, Section 1.6, KRS 63.030, and the historical precendent is established in Legislative Research Commission Report 176 - Impeachment in Kentucky. It is additionally affirmed upon the American Judicature Society website - removal of judges in the 50 states section, here.
Kentucky judges may be removed in one of two ways:
  • After notice and hearing, the judicial conduct commission may admonish, reprimand, censure, suspend, retire, or remove a judge. The commission's decisions are subject to review by the supreme court.
  • Judges may be impeached by the house of representatives and convicted by a two-thirds vote of the senate.
Greg Stumbo's office has been contacted repeatedly since the petition was filed, and Judiciary Chair John Tilley as well. Both have had their staff tell the petitioner they were "working on it". Requests for the proper impeachment committee be created have never been met. Both representatives now appear to be obstructing access to a proper inquiry committee. Greg Stumbo was on the 1991 Impeachment Inquiry Committee.

Kentucky's citizens should know that obstruction to access a fair and proper process as the law allows violates everyones right. It is the law. Greg Stumbo is declaring himself a dictator.

Voice your concerns about the obstruction to access a process by calling the legislative hotline at - 1-800-372-7181- and leave a message for House Speaker Stumbo, and your Rep., to give House Impeachment Petition - (1)  Due Process!

October 29, 2011

KFG Calls Out Chief Justice John Minton in Wake of Latest Fen-Phen Disbarrment

Chief Justice Minton Now Called Upon by Kentucky Family Guardian to give due process, and restitution to legitimate claims of damages against family court judges.

Day after day going back more than 10 years 1000's have been trampled, extorted, exploited, and racketeered by Ky's family courts. Many attorneys who practice in this area are just as scrupulous but on a smaller scale, victim by victim. They squeeze anywhere from a few 1000 to a few 100,000 depending on the case and family. Most are just working people getting divorced. Many stories are out there. one continues to be highlighted here and the claim is maintained and the plaintiff determined to hold the family judge liable for the damages, both actual and punative. Now the Kentucky court of Justice is called upon to hear claims for damages in individual cases committed by family court judges across this state.


KENTUCKY SUPREME COURT DISBARS JUDGE IN FEN-PHEN CASE

By BRETT BARROUQUERE — Associated Press

Posted: 10:52am on Oct 27, 2011; Modified: 4:14pm on Oct 27, 2011

By BRETT BARROUQUERE

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A once-ballyhooed $200 million settlement over a diet-drug has claimed five legal careers, the latest being the judge who oversaw the case.

The Kentucky Supreme Court on Thursday permanently disbarred retired judge Joseph F. "Jay" Bamberger for "the highly egregious nature of his ethical violations" in overseeing the 2001 settlement involving the drug fen-phen.

Bamberger, a circuit court judge in Boone and Gallatin counties from 1992 until his retirement in 2004, signed off on a deal that gave attorneys nearly two-thirds of the settlement and didn't disclose to clients the terms of the deal.
The court also ordered Bamberger to pay $18,700 to cover the cost of the disciplinary proceedings.
Bamberger described himself as "embarrassed" during a criminal trial related to the settlement and he stepped down as judge in February 2006 to avoid being removed by Kentucky's judicial conduct commission for his actions.

To date, Bamberger and four attorneys who took part in the settlement have lost their licenses. The state's high court is also weighing a request from the Kentucky Bar Association to revoke the license of Stanley Chesley, a prominent Cincinnati attorney known as the "Master of Disaster" for his handling of large, class-action cases.

Chesley, who has denied any wrongdoing in the settlement, has asked the high court to hear oral arguments over the Kentucky Bar Association's request to revoke his license, a move that could jeopardize his ability to serve as co-counsel in multiple high-profile class action cases.
Bamberger's disbarment stems from his handling of the settlement.
The high court found that attorneys William Gallion and Shirley Cunningham Jr., who once owned prized racehorse Curlin, along with Melbourne Mills Jr., kept $126 million, more than 63 percent of the settlement, for themselves and took another $20 million in "excess funds." The men distributed $74,194,577 to their clients, who were never told about the total amount of the settlement or the fees kept by the lawyers, Chief Justice John D. Minton wrote.

After the Kentucky Bar Association began investigating, Gallion, Mills and Chesley held an "off-the-record" meeting with Bamberger on Feb. 6, 2002 to have the judge secretly sign off on their fees, Minton wrote. After the meeting, Bamberger signed an order finding the attorneys' fees and expenses as paid in the case were "reasonable and necessary." Bamberger later admitted he had not read the settlement agreement or taken an accounting of it.

Four months later, Bamberger had the order filed with the clerk's office, but also ruled that all future orders would be provided only to the plaintiffs' lawyers and that all orders in the case be sealed.
Bamberger later authorized the creation of the Kentucky Fund for Healthy Living, a charity set up by the attorneys, with the $20 million in excess funds.

"Despite statements to the contrary, the plaintiff class never consented to the creation of KFHL with settlement funds," Minton wrote.

Gallion, Cunningham and Mills would become directors of the fund and receive $7,500 per month in salaries. Just before retiring as a judge, Bamberger relinquished court authority over the charity, saying it had fulfilled its charitable purpose, even though it had "never made any distributions for charitable purposes," Minton wrote. Bamberger then became a paid director of the funds, drawing $48,150 in salary over nine months.
Gallion and Cunningham resigned from the bar and were convicted in federal court on fraud charges. Both are in federal prison while they appeal. Mills and David Helmers, an associate of Gallion, have been disbarred for their roles in the settlement.

The former plaintiffs have sued the attorneys, winning a $42 million judgment in state court. That case is now before the Kentucky Supreme Court for review.


http://www.kentucky.com/2011/10/27/1936896/ky-court-disbars-judge-in-diet.html#ixzz1cDU37cV6

February 21, 2011

Is David Williams Covering Up For A Public Official Sought To Be Removed From Office?

February 22, 2011 - CENTRAL KENTUCKY - Wes Collins, from Clark County, claims he has evidence to support the removal of a Central Kentucky family court judge, and that Senate President David Williams has ordered his petition for removal by address not be given any due process before the Senate Judiciary Committee. “ He’s violating my rights,” Collins said.


Collins claims Senator Williams appears to be aiding in covering up the acts of misconduct and malfeasance committed by the public official, that the Judicial Conduct Commission failed to stop, and “that it’s our Right as Citizens of Kentucky to file such a petition and obtain due process on it.” Collins said.

Collins said he filed the Petition back in August 2010, pursuant to the Kentucky Bill of Rights section 1:6 and KRS 63.060, read into the record on January 4, 2011, and assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee. From there Collins said, “ I’ve been sandbagged and obstructed ever since. At first they acted like they didn’t know what to do with it, then the truth finally came out it was being obstructed by Williams.”

Collins claims that the judges wrongful acts were done on purpose and caused the loss of hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of property, and he was wrongfully deprived of his child in retaliation, because the issues of property loss and fraud were raised back to the judge sought to be removed. “The petition is warranted here because it was a cover up all the way to the Supreme Court of Kentucky,” Collins said.

Collins claims that under the circumstances of a complete and total fraud upon the courts, the petition is proper before the Senate, and it’s a citizens duty to exercise the right to bring rogue public officials to justice before the general assembly. “It’s also their duty to perform fairly and impartially. I’m wondering why he is obstructing the Petition if it’s not to cover up for the public official, and David Williams needs to answer that question “ Collins said.

Press agents may contact at cwescollins@att.net

###

February 11, 2011

Senate President David Williams Declares Kentucky Bill of Rights Dead

Kentucky Constitution Section 1 part 6 secures the right of every Kentuckian:
The right of assembling together in a peaceable manner for their common good, and of applying to those invested with the power of government for redress of grievances or other proper purposes, by petition, address or remonstrance.

A Petition for Removal by Address that was filed with the Ky Senate Clerk on August 30th 2010, read into the record January 4th 2011, and assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee, is being wrongfully delayed and denied by the committee Chairman, who is being misadvised by LRC staff and Senate President David Williams that the Senate has no "authority" to act upon the petition.
 
Two requests have been made by motion, each filed with the Senate Clerk, to be heard by the Committee in a preliminary inquiry proceeding. Both requests to be heard have been arbitrarily denied by the Senate Judiciary Chairman who has failed to hold inquiry hearings upon the petition.
 
Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Sen. Tom Jenson, met with the petitioner about 2 pm in the hall outside of Senate Chambers and said " I don't have any authority to give due process to the petition" and he defered to Senator David Williams as having said "their is no authority" for the Ky Senate to provide any process to the petitioner upon the petition filed for the propor purposes of removing the judge for acts of Official Misconduct. 
 
David Williams has therefore essentially said " The Kentucky Bill of Rights is Dead," that state government officials, such as family court judges, can commit acts of Official Misconduct, and if the "secretive administrative judges judging judges judicial conduct commission complaint" process fails, Ky Senate President David Williams will aid in covering up the acts of others, by denying your RIGHTS to petition for removal by address.   

December 11, 2010

PETITION TO REMOVE FAYETTE FAMILY COURT JUDGE FILED WITH KY SENATE

CENTRAL KENTUCKY - A Petition for Removal by Address was filed on August 30th 2010 with the Clerk of the Ky Senate. This Petition seeks to have Fayette Family Court Judge Jo Ann Wise removed from office for acts of fraud and official misconduct. The Petition, which came from our early state constitutions as a citizen tool to remove public officials from office, is listed in the Kentucky Bill of Rights section 1:6 and Kentucky Revised Statutes under section 63.060.
This Petition will be heard during the 2011 legislative session starting in January before a senate committee.

COUNT I

OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT

KRS 522.020(1)(a)
On about February 4, 2004 and continuing to the present, occurring in
both Madison and Fayette Counties,
JO ANN WISE,
while performing the duties of her elected position, prescribed in rule
and law, and executed upon oath of office as a Family Circuit Court Judge in
Fayette County, Commonwealth of Kentucky,
(1) did with intent to obtain or confer a benefit, and to injure another person
or to deprive another person of a benefit, she knowingly;
(a) Committed acts relating to her office, which constitutes an
unauthorized exercise of her official functions; to wit – (A) acted in bad faith
to injure parent child liberty interests, (B) acted in bad faith to injure
property rights and impair contracts, (C) acted in conspiracy to confer a
benefit of monetary gain upon others;

COUNT II

OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT

KRS 522.020(1)(b)

On about February 4,2004 and continuing to the present, occurring in both Madison and Fayette Counties,
JO ANN WISE,
while negligently performing the duties of the elected position,
prescribed in rule and law, and executed upon oath of office as a Family
Circuit Court Judge in Fayette County, Commonwealth of Kentucky,
(1) did with intent to obtain or confer a benefit or to injure another person or
to deprive another person of a benefit, did knowingly:
(b) Refrained from performing duties imposed upon them by law or
clearly inherent in the nature of the office; to wit, - (A) refrained from
protecting the rights of the father and child in their relationships, (B)
refrained from protecting the property rights of Petitioner and child as 3rd
party benefactor, intentionally allowing impairment of contracts (C)
refrained from an inherent duty to act upon information of fraud affecting
the proceeding.

COUNT III

OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT

KRS 522.020(1)(c)

That on or about February 4,2004 and continuing to the present, occurring in Fayette County,
JO ANN WISE,
while performing the duties of the elected position, prescribed in rule
and law, and executed upon oath of office as a Family Circuit Court Judge in
Fayette County, Commonwealth of Kentucky,
(1) did with intent to obtain or confer a benefit or to injure another person or
to deprive another person of a benefit, she knowingly
(c) Violated statute, lawfully adopted rule, and regulation relating to the
office,
(i) Bill of Rights
(ii) Ky Code of Judicial Conduct
(iii) Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure
(iv) KRS 403
(v) KRS 514.080 (1)(c)(d)
(vi) KRS 522.020 (1)(a)(b)(c)
(vii) 18 USC 241; 242; 1951(Hobbs Act

Petitioner Contact info: cwcpsc@bellsouth.net

August 27, 2010

AN OUT OF CONTROL UNACCOUNTABLE FAMILY COURT AND LEGAL SYSTEM

RACKETEERING, EXTORTION OF PROPERTY, VIOLATING PARENTAL RIGHTS, AND RETALIATION FOR EXERCISING RIGHTS

CENTRAL KENTUCKY - AUGUST 27 2010 - FOR 6 YEARS central Kentucky father, and now 6th district congressional write-in candidate, Wes Collins, has acted in performing what he feels is a duty as a citizen of Kentucky to expose corruption in family courts in Fayette County and across the state." 23 years before that he was leaving his parents working class home,  headed to college, after a minor scrape with the law that turned him around. He worked toward the goal of having a family and one day building a home for them with his own hands. He succeeded in those life goals with the completion of construction of a home for his family in June 2000.

It started in his own case in 2004 during a dissolution of marriage process in which he claims he was violated by complete corruption and abuse of power. Collins said, "I have also sought to hold the family court judge in my case in 2004 accountable, who he says, "acted knowingly and intentionally with official misconduct in collaboration with the adverse attorney to defraud him and his children of their home and property for the benefit of other members of the legal profession."

OFFICIALLY MANUFACTURED FALSE RECORD

Collins contends that, "he and his child were deprived of each other without any cause by an arbitrary order entered by the judge, when he raised the issue of the property fraud, violating their rights and damaging them." "My former spouse secretly stopped the mortgage payments during the process without disclosure, and her attorney knew it, and they concealed this by manufacturing false stories of  alleged "domestic violence as a ruse and cover."

"The attorney carefully manipulated the process," Collins said. " from the very beginning the attorney began to build a false story upon the record completely manufactured and the judge played along," I raised the issue  of fraud and dissipation of assets 4-5 times,and at one point demanded a Jury to decide if any cause was ever shown that I did anything wrong." The judge just sat and stared."

DISCOVERY OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED

After what Collins describes as being completely traumatized by the experience, he began to look around on the internet for others going through this process, thinking surely no one else had experience the humiliation and degradation by the officials that he had experienced. He began to discover wholesale abuses of rights, extortion of property, and deliberate deprivations of parent child relationships across Kentucky, then eventually networking with others all across the country. I met a guy over the internet who had been working as a private person, who read and studied the law, who went through his own damaging experience, and who was preparing class action lawsuits to be filed by violated people in every state. Collins said he was recruited to file for Kentucky. "Apparently I had become what hundreds of thousands of others in Kentucky and across the country had become - victims of the law." The class action lawsuits, filed in federal court on September 17 2004 in 44 states, were all very quickly dismissed.

NOTIFYING SUPERVISORY JUDGES OF FRAUD AND MISCONDUCT

After attempts to get supervisory judges of the court of appeals, supreme court, and conduct commission to review his claims of fraud and misconduct by the judge and attorney from 2004 to 2006, he said "they talked around his claims in their opinions, or simply ignored them,  turning a blind eye to the misconduct and fraud of the judge and attorney, In January 2007, I filed a civil lawsuit against the judge, the attorney, the conduct commission, the bar association, and the now former Chief Justice Joseph E. Lambert." from here Collins said, "things dramatically worsened."

EXERCISING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO HOLD  PUBLIC OFFICIALS ACCOUNTABLE.

The lawsuit was filed in Fayette Civil Circuit Court, case no. 2006-CI-5254 claiming negligence in the performance of duties, malpractice, and negligent supervisory duties, among others. Collins says "he remembers that first day he appeared in court upon his lawsuit, and how he felt this "chilling vibe" coming from the judge, and the assistant attorney general who was sent down from Frankfort as defense for the Judges, and that at all times the projection of animosity and a "how dare you sue our friends the lawyer/judges you tiny little person" attitude toward him.

The Fayette circuit court Judge rather quickly dismissed the complaint citing "failure to state a claim and that the judges were immune from an lawsuits." Collins said he inquired "if the defendants were immune to act with criminal conduct." to which he was informed by the presiding judge to be careful who he accused of criminal conduct. Collins then appealed the dismissal of the lawsuit in April 2007 where it sat for a long time.

PUBLIC OFFICIALS BECOME LAWBREAKERS

In June of 2007, having been deprived of his son for over 3 years without cause, Collins went to the family court in Scott County where Wise, "on her own accord," had arbitrarily transferred the case. Collins went there and filed a petition for a temporary custody order to get his son back because of - "ongoing hostile tones taken by the step parent toward his son."  Collins felt he could "tell that judge of the wrongdoing that occurred in Fayette, and get a fair process to return his son," He said. "to the contrary, Scott family judge Tamra Gormley (The supreme court on August 26 upheld the conduct commission's findings of 2 counts of misconduct against Gormley unrelated to her acts against Collins) lit into me after I claimed fraud in the other court, dismissed my petition, praised the other judge, ordered me to get a mental evaluation, and then return to court about 30 days later with some proof I was complying, that if I didn't get one, or return, that she would throw me in jail."

" I read the law," Collins said, "and I knew my rights. I knew that public officials can't act like that, could not do the things that had just been done to me. They had violated their oaths of office, they had become usurpers of the office, and they had trampled down the rights of an innocent father, and an innocent child." Collins said, he " knew by the law" that he didn't have to return because his petition had  been dismissed, and by the civil rules of procedure and case law that the court would lose any power to act on "his" petition after ten days, losing jurisdiction.

THE OFFICIAL ORCHESTRATED ARREST

On August 30 2007, in what revealed itself as a deliberate premeditated false arrest directed by the judges Gormley, Wise, Court of appeals Chief Judge Sara Combs, Lexington Attorney Adele Burt Brown, and Jason Nemes(a former chief staff attorney of Justice Lambert), the former Director of the Administrative Office of the Courts. Collins said, " I had done nothing wrong accept become trapped in a web of deception and abuse of power."  Collins said he was arrested at his fiance's home while sleeping in the back bedroom, upon a fraudulent "civil contempt" bench warrant issued by Scott family judge Gormley. "Because I filed suit, they retaliated against me."

The Clark County Sheriffs Dept carried out the deed of arrest, rough up, and fishing expedition for anything that could be used against him. After being handcuffed he was taken outside and set on the porch, then deputies went back in and brought out his hunting rifles from the gun rack on the bedroom wall." Collins said, " I learned as I was being carted away that someone behind the scenes was pulling the strings. We stopped momentarily in the road as another car pulled along side. That driver told the other [Nemes] wanted them to give a call when they "got him."  That deputy then picked up his cell phone and called someone."

Collins fiance, TCM (identity limited to respect her privacy for now), said "she refused the deputies entry into her home that morning, because they did not have a search warrant." "they told me they had a warrant for his arrest and that they wanted to come in an arrest him." "I told them no, that I would get him and he would come to the door and calmly meet them there."

What happened next TCM explained,." was that I attempted to close my door and one of the deputies stuck his foot in it, he pushed back hard on the door, sending be backwards and they forced their way in. I was terrified, they were acting very aggressive and I became afraid. Our child was present. When they were bringing him out, and he was asking them what it was all about, I was shaking violently and crying, and telling them not to hurt him."

Collins said he was then taken away to jail. When he got there, "they began to tell me I was in a lot of trouble, that I was in violation of a domestic court order, that I was a felon in possession of a firearm, and I was going  to be going away for a long time"  TCM said. " After they took him away, They began to ask me if he had been threatening any judges." " "I told them no, he had been trying to get his son back, and he never made any threats to anyone."  "They told me that an ATF agent was going to get in touch with me, and they left."

Collins explained that "after twelve days in Clark County Jail, I was informed that the US Attorney's office in Lexington was going to pick the case up." Over the course of the next 50 days, Collins said he was then taken to the Scott County Jail on the illegally issued civil contempt bench warrant issued by Gormley, then a week and a half later, the Madison County Jail on a misdemeanor charge "that I had no idea what it was about and after a few weeks was dismissed." Then, along came the ATF agent. "I was picked up from Madison, and transported to Fayette County by the ATF agent. .

Collins' now wife, TCM, stated that, "after they took him away I was devastated. I had been with him every step of the way as he sought to get his son back, and his lost assets as a result of the Fayette County family judges control over the situation.. I had attended with him each time he went back, over and over, pleading for her to reverse her order depriving him of his son, and about the property fraud, but all she ever kept doing was ignoring him, mocking him, laughing at him under her breath as if she was taking great joy in hurting them. I was to be a witness in his civil suit against them."

TCM, says what happened 5 days after they arrested him made her even more fearful. "One of the Deputies called me and said they needed to come by and get a statement from me." "I told him I had nothing to say." He showed up at my home a little while later alone and that he needed a statement from me, that it needed to say I had given them consent to come in, and that I had better "think about my daughter." "I started to shake. He gave me a pen and pad of paper and told me what I needed to write." " I was shaking so badly that I could hardly write it." he said just real simple, that I had given them consent to enter my home."

TCM said, " after he took the statement from me, a second deputy showed up, looked at the statement, ask me if I wrote it, then signed it as a witness. I was told if  had any more guns in the house that I should turn them over." " The ATF agent shows up and starts asking me again if Wes had made any threats toward judges." I told him no, he's only been trying to get his son and lost assets back."

TCM explained that, "they had me turnover the other small handgun and box of ammunition." Then again reminded me that I needed to think about my daughter and went so far as to say, "you need to leave him, just let it go. I felt so intimidated. They told me I'd be getting a summons soon.

THE OFFICIAL MISCODUCT AND  RETALIATION EMERGES.

Collins was finally brought before the US District Court in Lexington in October 2007, and had been "appointed" a federal publicdefender, another Lexington attorney who subsequently is in the same building as Adele Brown, "one of the defendants in my civil suit."  At the detention hearing as it's called,  Brown is present.."When I looked back, she smirked and it became clear, they had all crossed over the criminal line, in conspiracy, In violation of state law and federal law, such as KRS 522 Abuse of public office, 524.055 Retaliating against a participant in the legal process.18 USC 241 Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law, to name a few."

Collins explained that he had been networking with many people across Kentucky since the time this ordeal began, and had witnesses present in the courtroom as witnesses to the proceedings. "They observed the presence of Brown, and the demeanor of those present." Then the script began to run. "My appointed attorney began by arguing on behalf of my release upon my own recognizence, the assistant US Attorney, who engaged in contact with Brown during the process began by presenting the long argument as to why I should remain jailed. "He put his witnesses on the stand, the pre-trial information collector who interviewed me, and the ATF agent,". Collins said, "It took a bizarre but obvious twist."

SUED STATE OFFICIALS FULLY INVOLVED IN RETALIATION.

Both the pre-trial officer and the ATF agent claimed to have interviewed Jason Nemes AOC (Lambert), Sara Combs COA, Jo Ann Wise, and Adele Burt Brown. Both testified that "they all felt threatened by me, that I was engaging in harassing communications against them, and on and on." The ATF agent testified that he talked with Jason Nemes. "The AOC was contacted in 2006, specifically Nemes, to report the official misconduct occurring,". Collins explained. " during the course of my actions to present the information of wrongdoings to all supervisory entities, I ended up eventually talking to Jason Nemes at the AOC." The ATF agent stated that Nemes told him I was highly aggitated in my converstaion with him," said Collins, "and that I told him I would either get justice with someone above Wise, or I would get justice myself." "That was a lie." Collins explained, "What I did say to him was that I would either get justice with someone above Wise, or I would get Justice by filing a petition for removal by address to the Kentucky Senate and have her removed from office." " He knew I had done my homework."

Collins says, " All of this is on record in transcripts, that I have - and they provided it to me!" But what I learned from my wife while in jail was more disturbing."  TCM said that, "when they were obtaining an indictment from the grand jury against him, they made me come to testify before them." " When I arrived that morning I was meet by the Asst. US Attorney. He talked to me n a room for about half an hour. He was basically trying to determine if I was going to maintain the statement made to the deputies that I had given them consent to enter, and the the rifles were Wes's." I started to tell him that the statement was not true, that I was intimidated into making it, and was scared. He then left the room."

TCM said, " he came back a few minutes later and said it was time to go. We walked up the hall to the elevators where we were joined by the ATF agent. We rode up and when we exited, the ATF agent pulled me to the side and the US attorney  walked  on.. He told me that I better think hard about my testimony, that I would want to keep my daughter in mind, and if I changed my statement I could get into trouble for perjury.I started to shake again. We walked on around and the prosecutor called me in and I was again intimdated and coerce to say what they wanted said."

Collins said that while they were deciding his fate, he learned of these things from TCM. "We even had a neighbor who witnessed the forced entry, who gave a deposition of the facts, but that didn't seem to matter." Collins says that he was indicted at first for possession of a firearm by someone -subject- to a domestic violence order, and then they went back and dug into old archive records until they found the file of the scrape I had 28 years ago. It was a felony arrest for 3rd degree burglery." Collins said that, " I was hanging with the wrong crowd and some damage was done to a window of an old gas station out on a rural road, and being with the wrong crowd got implicated into it". Collins explained that he was given leniency by the judge at that time, that it was a deferred adjudication and "I was granted a conditonal time period that if I didn't get into trouble again it would go away. I left for college and didn't look back."

SQUASH YOU LIKE A BUG AND THE APPEAL OF THE CIVIL SUIT PENDING

Collins said he was released with an ankle bracelet October 24 2007, and was confined to a two county area , " So there I was," said Collins, " smack in the middle of a huge conspiracy and abuse of power moment. But part of me knew that this was the time to try to compel my appointed attorney to do her duty under the law, professional rules of conduct, or conscience, and report the family judge and attorney for their malfeasence. " I raised the issue at every meeting with her discussing the defense." finally after she had avoided the issue of reporting them, she blurted out, "we could squash you like a bug." "I was taken back and speechless for a moment." said Collins.

My attorney was seen cohorting in the halls with Attorney Brown back during the detention hearing, a defendent in the civil suit for malpractice. " My watchers reported this to me and swore affidavits to these facts. " Collins said. While he was meetng with hs attorney Collins explained that the assistant US attorney who was also collaberating with Brown during the detention hearing, delivered a ream of documents to us. From the looks of it you would have thought that it was a lot of document evidence against me, " said Collins, " but as it turns out there were multiple copies of 4 and 5 of the same documents from the family court record, the old archive documents from 28 years ago, and some from the ATF agents office." What was most interesting and revealed upon some of the documents said Collins, " was a fax number on the top of some that pointed right back to Judge Jo Ann Wise's office."

PUSH TO BRING FORTH THE TRUTH

Collins explaind that he was holding for a jury trial and instucted his attorney to file a motion to have a supression hearing to deny the alleged evidence (none) and dismiss the case for false arrest and unlawful entry into the home, " there we could bring forth the testimony of TCM and the 3rd party witness who saw the forced entry, cross examine TCM on the stand and the trith could come out. "They weren't goin to let that happen." said Collins.Because we chose to call TCM to the stand, the prosecutor moved the federal judge to appoint TCM an attorney who could advise her of her rights regarding perjury. "This was more intimidation against her, " explained Collins." She met the appointed attorney, Pamela Ledgewood, and when she returned home, she  told that she [Ledgewood] had continued to infer to her that she could be chaged with perjury even after she told her that the hand written statement and grand jury testimony was coerced under threat and duress, and not true.

THE SUPPRESSION HEARING

The federal judge had previously dimissed the two counts of possession of firearm while suject to d.v.o.(which was falsely entered back in 2003 and extended 2005 after it had expired.) by finding "it had been issued by Fayette family judge Wise in violation of my due process rights," said Collins. But the supression hearing on the counts of possession by a felon were being pushed forward. " I told my appointed attorney that that did not end up being a lifelong felony conviction but she would never put forth the defense that it was. I had voted for many yeas, served jury duty, and had all of my rights intact. I ask her to show me case law that it was, and she never could, " said Collins. "I have researched it and case law clearly says it was not a conviction because the entry of a Judgement was withheld. The terms and condition expired without further incident.

The hearing washeld and from the onset things were obviously being tightly controlled. The deputies were all present,  along with the lawyer appointed to TCM.  On the way to the courthouse that morning, "Tiffany became very sick with nerves, " Collins said. "In the courthouse she was now being pressured by the presence of the deputies who arrested me, the ATF agent, and she was visibly shaken by it.. The Judge asked what we wanted to do, and appointed attorney for Collins indicaed that we wanted to call Tiffany to the stand. " This became the magic moment," said Collins. " They called for a meeting in chambers and the judge called a 5 minute recess. They all went to the judges office, and I went to the restroom. On the way back in TCM was standing in the hallway looking terrible and I asked her "if she was ok." " She said yea and we went back in."

"Here it got really odd, " Collins said, "when we resumed, the attorney who had been appointed to TCM spoke up and told the judge she had great concerns about TCM's risk of potential perjury, that she had felt that I was pressuring her, and she was advising her to plead the 5th. She then said I had attempted to talk to TCM in the hallway during the break, making this out to be like I had tried to pressure her."

Because it was portrayed this way, the motion to supress was denied, and I was ordered taken back into custody. I had been deprived of my 6th amendmen right to cross examine TCM where the truth that her statement and testimony would have been shown to be a subornation of perjury obtained under threat and intimidation. I was taken out and while being led down the hall  I passed out from ahving not eaten in 3 days prior to the supression hearing. Later I was taken out to Woodford County Jail where I was placed in an isolation tank with the tempratures very cold.

My appointed attorney arrived late that evening and coaxed me to accept a deal where I would enter a conditional plea, and retain the right to appeal the supression hearing, and that I would get a 12 month sentence. havingbeen put through what I can only describe as a form of torture, I went along with it. I still knew the case from 28 years ago was not a conviction, I thought, surely the appeals court would see what was going on, see that my 6th amendment right was violated, and remand it back for dimissal.

HABEAS CORPUS AND ACTUAL INNOCENCE

Boy was I ever crushed in my faith in the fairness of this process," said Collins. "The appeal was, in the only way I can describe it - washed away without regard to 6th amendment rights. It is now my only remaining option to file a writ of habeas corpus back to the federal district court upon the claim that the prior case from 28 years ago did not constitute a conviction. The case law supports this claim, and I feel confident that justice will prevail and it all will be dismissed. The habeas corpus will be filed asap."

In the meantime, my civil suit against the public officials is still pending before the fayette cuircuit court, because the order entered allegedly dismissing my complaint was interlocutory and non-final, because it did not contain the required finality language as set forth in the rules of procedure. I will re-open that action soon also.
[more to come here]

March 29, 2010

KY SUPREME COURT STALLS ON GORMLEY APPEAL

CENTRAL KY - The Kentucky Supreme Court appears to be delaying the appeal of Scott Family Court Judge Tamra Gormley. Gormley was found to have committed Judicial Misconduct by the Judicial Conduct Commission in December 2009, and sentenced Gormley to 45 days suspension without pay. Gormley's suspension was stayed while she appealed to the Supreme Court.

http://kentuckyfamilylaw.blogspot.com/2009/11/family-court-judge-suspended-45-days.html


Gormley was also found guilty of Misconduct on additional counts in a separate action, that was also appealed, then consolidated with the other case. In addition to time gained from moving the court to consolidate, the Supreme Court, on it's own initiative, set the briefing schedule for 30 days out, gave 10 more days than the rules allow. This was done, it was said, because of the multiple misconduct convictions. Then, as the deadline for the 30 days approached, Gormley's attorney filed a motion to extend the time again. The court granted the request but indicated it was a final extention.

http://162.114.92.78/dockets/CaseDetailFormat.asp?CaseNumber=2010-SC-000010

Gormley has enjoyed the suspension of the disciplinary sentence imposed that suspended her without pay for 45 days. If you and I are convicted of something, we wouldn't enjoy and automatic stay of the sentence while we appealed our case. Where is equal protection of the law in this circumstance? Why does a Judge who is convicted of misconduct not have to suffer the penalty imposed, if ever, until after the appeal process has run the course. Why do people convicted of crimes not get the penalty suspended until the appeal process has run the course?

With many citizens petitioning and filing claims of misconduct, those claims of Judicial Corruption and misconduct in Family Courts are ignored. Often those claims are being further covered up by the higher supervisory courts and conduct commission. Why then has Gormley not been spared by the "wink" and the "nod" that occurs in other cases? Maybe she has, and maybe the Supreme Court will provide that for her, since it has provided a generous extention of time.

Gormley's case could be, like one of those from the past, used to create the appearance of accountablity then let off the hook behind the scenes on the appeal. What about the other complaints that are ingnored or actually covered up? What about cases where the judges conduct is so egregious as to constitute criminal conduct? Do you think you can get the ear of a commonwealth attorney or maybe even an Assistant U.S. Attorney? Think again.

We will continue to watch this case closely, as well as press harder upon the Supreme Court and Conduct Commission to hear other complaints and cases, and if needed, direct it to the proper prosecution authority for access to a Grand Jury.

You can contact us with your story or complaints regarding judicial misconduct or other acts by sending a confidential email to kyfreedomfighter@gmail.com

November 03, 2009

Family Court Judge Suspended 45 days

Tuesday, Nov. 03, 2009Comments (19) Recommend (14)
Family court judge suspended for 45 days on misconduct charges By Shawntaye Hopkins - shopkins@herald-leader.com




FRANKFORT — A Central Kentucky family court judge accused of judicial misconduct has been suspended for 45 days without pay and publicly reprimanded.

The Judicial Conduct Commission, the state's judicial oversight body, ruled that Judge Tamra Gormley, whose district covers Scott, Woodford and Bourbon counties, inappropriately handled two cases: a domestic violence hearing in Scott County and a child custody hearing in Woodford County.
A third count against Gormley, which stemmed from a child custody case in Scott County, was dismissed because the commission said the charge was not proven by clear and convincing evidence.

Tamra Gormley is facing three of seven charges in this week's trial.


Gormley's attorney, William Hoskins of Lexington, said he reviewed the order Monday and discussed it with Gormley. Hoskins said they appreciate the commission for dismissing one charge but respectfully disagree with the findings on the other charges.
Hoskins said they are contemplating an appeal.

The commission released its ruling Friday — nearly a month after Gormley's hearing. The commission, the only entity authorized to discipline a sitting Kentucky judge, had until Feb. 19 to render a decision.

The ruling says Gormley violated a man's due process rights in a Scott County case. The commission said she held a man in contempt without advance notice and without his attorney present. Gormley did not witness the actions outside the courtroom that led to the contempt charge.

The commission said that while "a court undoubtedly has the power to hold a person in contempt of court for actions outside the sensory perception of the judge" (as was true in this situation), it "may not exercise that power without holding a hearing that provides the person with advance notice of the contempt proceeding."

On the second count, the commission found that Gormley entered a change of custody order that removed a child from the custody of her father but denied the father the right to put on his own evidence. Gormley, the commission found, acted as an advocate for the mother in that case.
Gormley's actions "were not mere legal error," the ruling says. "A reasonably prudent and competent judge would conclude the conduct of Judge Gormley to be obviously and seriously wrong in all the circumstances of the cases."

Hoskins disagreed. The commission did not cite any Kentucky law that was violated, he said, and there were no independent witnesses who testified against Gormley during the hearing on the charges.

"We truly believe Judge Gormley applied the appropriate Kentucky law and did so in good faith," he said.

October 21, 2009

SCOTT FAMILY JUDGE TAMRA GORMLEY CHARGED WITH JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT


Thursday, Oct. 01, 2009Comments (25) Recommend (28)
Deliberations begin in judicial misconduct case
Commission's findings on judge could be issued in weeks
By Shawntaye Hopkins - shopkins@herald-leader.com

The state's Judicial Conduct Commission will begin deliberations Thursday in the case of a Central Kentucky family court judge accused of misconduct.
The commission, which is the only entity authorized to discipline a sitting Kentucky judge, has until Feb. 19 to render a decision in the case against Judge Tamra Gormley. Commission Chairman Stephen Wolnitzek told attorneys that the commission does not intend to take that long.
The commission's findings could come in two weeks at the earliest, Wolnitzek said. Possible penalties include public or private reprimand, suspension without pay or removal or retirement from office.

Tamra Gormley is facing three of seven charges in this week's trial. Gormley, a former assistant commonwealth's attorney in Fayette County who was appointed in 2007 to a district that covers Scott, Woodford and Bourbon counties, faces seven misconduct charges. Three of the charges were heard this week.

Gormley took the stand for about four hours as George Rabe, an lawyer hired by the commission, and Gormley's attorney, William Hoskins of Lexington, questioned her about decisions she made in family court.

One charge stems from an incident in which Gormley held a man in contempt for violating a domestic violence order and sentenced him to six months in jail. The man was in a hallway outside the courtroom when he confronted his wife and made her upset, witnesses later told Gormley in court. Also, a bailiff told Gormley the man had visited his wife the night before.

Gormley testified that she was permitted to hold the man in direct criminal contempt without a hearing as long as court was in recess or in session and the man was willfully violating a court order and disrupting court proceedings.

Gormley was also questioned about an emergency protective order she issued without a petition, and her actions in a custody case in Scott County in which the commission says she did not have jurisdiction.

Elkhart Superior Court Judge Evan Roberts testified Wednesday morning about his interactions with Gormley in the custody case.

Roberts said that a court in Indiana had continuing exclusive jurisdiction in the case, but a child custody hearing was held on Sept. 24, 2008, in Scott Family Court. A grandmother and her attorney were in Scott County. The child's mother and her attorney were in Indiana.
During the court proceeding, the Indiana court had audio, but no video, from Scott Family Court.
Roberts, who later received a copy of the video, said he was not aware of notes passed between Gormley and the grandmother. And, he said, Gormley appeared to favor one party.
Hoskins said Gormley did not act in bad faith and was not "grossly and persistently incompetent," which are standards he said are set by the Supreme Court and must be considered by the commission.

Rabe, in closing, asked the commission, "Why do we have laws ... if they're not followed?"
He restated disagreements with Gormley's decisions and her interpretations of laws and asked the commission to "take judicial notice of Kentucky Revised Statutes that are involved."

May 20, 2009

Help Defeat The Destruction of Parents and Children In Kentucky



Justice will only exist where those not affected by injustice are filled with the same indignation as those offended - Plato


Ky. Constitution - Section 2:

Absolute and arbitrary power over the lives, liberty and property of freemen exists nowhere in a republic, not even in the largest majority.








_____________________________________________
Since 2004 I have worked to expose and defeat this Human Trafficking Industry in Kentucky. It is Federally funded and subsidized. I think you will find the truth appalling. Decide for yourself.

CPS: the system cannot be trusted
Former Senator Nancy Schaefer exposes the Federally Funded - legal kidnapping- human trafficking in children by state agencies.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KyO55smJyQ&feature=PlayList&p=ED4B1ABB8950AC4B&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=53

VIDEO: Alex Jones: CPS Involved In Child Trafficking Rings Explains Senator Schaefer
Does your representative (Chandler, McConnell) stay silent while children and families continue to be exploited to provide money to the state, or are they interested in making right and moral changes? Ask them!

CPS Involved In Child Trafficking Rings Explains Senator
Schafer 1 of 4 - Jones mentions the "Obama Youth Agenda"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwBBK7MOtDU

CPS Involved In Child Trafficking Rings Explains Senator
Schafer 2 of 4 - Adoption and Safe Families Act 1974- Walter Mondale/Clinton expansion 1994 - Bonuses to states
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8vELk6T9p4&feature=related

CPS Involved In Child Trafficking Rings Explains Senator
Schafer 3 of 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbAqB4j5BrE&feature=related

CPS Involved In Child Trafficking Rings Explains Senator
Schafer 4 of 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_dvzZBK0o8&feature=related


_____________________________________________________________

We have had some success and the credit goes to many others besides myself
Child Protective System Investigation - Videos - WLKY Louisville - Thanks to John Boel

...and you may remember we had to go to court just to air our initial report after an attempt by the state to stop us from showing you what's going on... Rick Van Hoose - WLKY 32 Co-Anchor.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAnjp7OnxNM&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHw_kbsAZ6A&feature=related

Abuse of power?
Social workers lied, falsified records - OIG report issuedhttp://www.whas11.com/news/hebert/stories/011107whasmjdTopSocialWorkers.2e6f4512.html
From Archives: January 11, 2007
_____________________________________

Increasing adoptions: A good idea gone wrong?

Almost 10 years ago, Congress passed a law that gives states bonuses if they can get children languishing in foster care adopted quickly. Some child welfare experts say those bonuses have put some children at risk.
But why would a state pressure welfare workers to force adoptions? One reason may be money. States can earn federal bonuses for keeping adoption numbers high, and in Kentucky workers can even get extra vacation.
“It was illegal what was happening,” Moore says. “And nobody was doing anything. What they did every year is they set a quota based on the previous year's number of adoptions.”
An NBC News computer analysis shows adoptions have risen dramatically nationwide — in Kentucky they've tripled in six years — while those federal bonuses have grown to more than $1 million.
But the number of kids returned to their parents has dropped sharply. States don't get bonuses for that. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13304867/from/ET/
_________________________________________

Remove the Father

The Racket of Family Court Exposed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u38LzlYp78k&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ekentuckyfamilylaw%2Eblogspot%2Ecom%2F&feature=player_embedded

_______________________________________________________

Love Big Oligarchy.

Talk about taking over the We The People Liberty Movement, our own Court of Justus' child indoctrination programs at work in our schools.
No Talk of the Ky. Constitution and the Ky Bill of Rights.


Commonwealth News Center Update

The following articles were found matching your subscription profile.New Press Releases:Six student teams to compete in state showcase for We the People: Project Citizen on May 19 in FrankfortURL : http://kentucky.gov/Newsroom/kycourts/PR05152009A.htm

Date: Friday, May 15, 2009
Issued By : Kentucky Court of Justice
Summary : Student teams from from five Kentucky middle schools and one elementary school will compete in the state showcase for We the People: Project Citizen. The winning entry will go to the national showcase for judging in July. Project Citizen is a hands-on, portfolio-based civic education program that promotes participation in local and state government by teaching students about the public policy process and encouraging civic involvement.
_____________________________________________

Same Hands...

16 in the Ky House. 10 In the Ky Senate. 1 In the Ky Governors chair.
On Office of General Counsel exists in every agency subdivision and broom closet of state government.

A lawyer is an officer of the court. It is a constitutional violation of separation of powers and nullifies checks and balances if they "infiltrate the legislative or executive branch" because they are of the "same hands."

http://www.constitutionalguardian.com/pdfs/86.pdf 

The US Constitution was specifically written to prevent any single "same hands" group from accumulating all powers of government, one particular group has succeeded in doing precisely that.

James Madison, author of the US Constitution, wrote :
"No political truth is certainly of greater intrinsic value or is stamped with the authority of more enlightened patrons of liberty than that ... the accumulation of all powers legislative, executive and judiciary in the same hands, whether of one, a few or many, and whether hereditary, self appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."

For then the laws are made not to serve justice, but rather to serve the personal profit of those who make them.
However for many years now, all three branches of government and the powers they command to control all government, legislative, executive and judiciary have effectively "accumulated in the same hands". Those "same hands" belong to the legal profession. As a result the "same hands" lawyer/judges now make the laws, interpret the laws and enforce the laws, thus defeating the spirit, intent and purpose of the Constitution. Such control by this or any other group, is unconstitutional because it violates both the separation of powers/checks and balances principles of the Constitution.__________________________________________________________________


On Facebook:
KY JUDICIAL WATCH - FAMILY LAW REFORM

"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear."

Marcus Tullius Cicero, 42 BC.

May 13, 2009

The Racket of Family Court Exposed

This interview with Alec Baldwin exposes how Family Courts are a Racket against parents for the purposes of profiteering by attorneys and judges who enable them.

April 25, 2008

Supporting Family Law Reform in Kentucky

There are two ways you can now support

1. Every time you search the web
photos1.blogger.com Click here to search.
Make it your home page or put a shortcut on your desktop.

2. When you shop online.

iGive.com

THANK YOU

FOR SUPPORTING

THE KENTUCKY FAMILY GUARDIAN